My take on Obama's speech - still not convinced

Barack Obama's speech is already being lauded as a major address on race in America. It was not. It was a campaign speech - a very good one, but with a select agenda, which is not the curing of America's racial tensions, but getting Barack Obama elected President.

Although his presentation of the differing groups within the American mix was accurate and well presented, the conclusions or lessons to be drawn from such an outline were non-existent. Obama gave no specifics nor suggestions as to how we, as Americans, could do anything about these festering problems, but to vote for him.

While everyone praises this speech they fail to appreciate that he has now defined the election not as a choice between "post-racial" candidates or a color-blind race based on policies and qualifications, but as a litmus test on racism.

We are not made freer to chose between the candidates independent of race, but are being forced into making our votes a referendum on racism itself. From this moment on, anyone who fails to succumb to Obama's charm and his paper thin resume is simply a backward looking racist.

Although Obama ticked off a list of polices we're led to believe he would support, his actual policy papers and economic advisers remain the most conservative of the original Democratic troika.

Until the Rev. Wright tapes exploded into the mass media last week, Sen. Obama and his campaign had largely skirted the issue of race. When it suited their electoral strategy to manufacture disingenuous charges of racism on the part of the Clinton Campaign ("fairy tale", "Lyndon Johnson", "...as far as I know", "He's lucky to be who he is") they did so, sometimes shamelessly. As I'm sure strategist David Axelrod knew they would, these phony outrages played out in teevee sound bites and selectively edited YouTube clips. Within days, the Hillary Clinton who had been exemplary on race and the issues that mattered to African-American families, was transformed into something "worse than George Wallace."

Sen. Obama said that the issue of race was an "an issue Americans cannot afford to ignore right now". Yes, but oddly enough he'd managed to ignore it pretty entirely until charges of racism were leveled at his "white devil" minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Was it America or just Obama himself who could not "afford to ignore" the issue any longer?

Accounting the abuses, sorrows, and fears of both the African-American community and that of Middle America, Obama painted himself as the heir to them both, while simultaneously painting us, the listener, into that corner where the only way we can affirm our rejection of racism is to vote for him.

Who else but Obama could turn a losing hand such as Wright had dealt him and turn it on his critics so deftly? It was no longer Wright's evident racism that might prevent them from voting for him, but their own. This was done in an understated, almost self-deprecating way, as it had to be, given the awesome impertinence of what he was actually selling.

Although Geraldine Ferraro was savaged by the Obamabots for pointing out that Obama was lucky to be who he was, Obama himself once again held up his DNA like a magical totem and offered himself to the public.

I do not believe that Sen. Obama, for all his DNA, is the most qualified to be president, however good we can make ourselves feel about ourselves by voting for him.

He is a shrewd and extraordinarily gifted politician, as this speech shows, but the United States is in the middle of an economic and military meltdown and needs something more.

But if Democrats really have no choice but to vote for Obama to expiate their collective racial discomfort, it is again likely that the junior senator from Illinois will win the nomination in August.

As the repository of all the party's idealism and audacious hope then, the issue of Rev. Wright will come back to the forefront.

I not only fear, but feel fairly certainty, that when Obama goes forth to assail the party which, frankly, doesn't give damn about "change" or voting against their own barely concealed racism, he will be destroyed.

Having thrown the racist charge over every little slight (real, perceived, or manufactured) at his Democratic opponent, Sen. Obama will be the proverbial "boy who cried wolf" when the real volleys come at him from the GOP.

Most Americans didn't want this to be a referendum on race and racism, but on the larger picture in which racism is but another instrument wielded by a corrupted and collapsing ruling class. This was the election in which people of differing colors, cultures, and economic status were to join together to advance an agenda of domestic reform and international realignment.

But now that the election has been hijacked and turned into a referendum on racism in which a vote for anyone other than Obama is itself an act perpetuating racial hatred, it has ceased to be about Democrats winning, but about purging the party itself with an Obama litmus test, even if it leads to electoral defeat in November.

I reject this framing. Voting for Obama (and all that magic DNA) does not guarantee an end to racism. It doesn't even guarantee a coherent program on the kitchen table issues of poverty, health care, and education - the very tangible pragmatic means by which the imbalance between the races in America can continue to be worn down.

Sen. Obama may be another wonderful lost cause (like Al Smith) which the Democratic Party can feel proud of. We can sit around patting ourselves on the back as the US continues to COLLAPSE around us.

Obama needs to persuade people he has the program and the ability to win the General Election, not just that he has the right racial mix.

Supporters would like to say that he has given his race speech and he's not going to go there again during the campaign. Really? Obama may have no choice. Yes, it's cruel, yes, it's unfair, but if you think we've seen the end of those Jeremiah Wright YouTube clips, you are very, very wrong.

Frankly, I think the problem offered by the combination of anthem, flag pin, "really proud", and Rev. Wright will be augmented by new characters in the galaxy of anti-American extremists surrounding him as the GOP creates the shorthand to destroy him.

"Obama is alien, weird, un-American and his friends/family are worse."

Signed. Sealed. Delivered.

Good Morning, President McCain



Display:


Re: My take on Obama's speech - still not convince (none / 0)

There is NO biological basis for the idea or concept of race. It is NOT a scientific concept. It is NOT in people's DNA. It is a social construct.


by DrPolitics on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 07:43:54 PM EST

Re: My take on Obama's speech - still not convince (none / 0)

I'm not the one claiming that Obama's mixed blood makes him de facto the cure for what ails us - he is.

Indeed, the fact that race is a social construct (as you agree) was one of the reasons I foudn Rev Wright's speeches so ignorant.  

Being Irish myself, I am well aware that my people, Italians, Spaniards, Slavs and other ethnic groups in "Europe" were themselves not considered "white" until fairly recently.

For the Rev to just lump all "white" people together  the way he did was to endorse a view of history that might stir his parishioners but does little to advance mutual understanding and solidarity.

Thanks anyway for clarifying that


by PadraigPearse on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 11:58:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

How long was that speech? (none / 0)

Can anything tell me anything he said except that Ferraro was as bad as Rev. Wright?


by MediaFreeze on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 07:55:24 PM EST

Re: My take on Obama's speech - still not convince (none / 0)

Actually, it was Mr. Obama who had to mend fences with his white supporters who were treated to a
glimpse behind the curtain of how African-Americans speak of "color" in their own house of worship.  

For those of us who have not really paid attention to African-Americans in their churches it was a bit disconcerting to say the least.  

White Obama supporters can rest easy again tonight though.  Mr. Obama has poured oil on these turbulent waters by his honest and as someone said the "deep depth" of Mr. Obama's analysis of race in America. He said it in words that us Whites can
understand in the better part of ourselves.  

We can forget now the brief shattering moment when he lied to us for three days about not being in church to hear Rev. Wright have God damn America. In our hour of need, he came through for us and swept our doubts safely under the carpet.

The media (mostly Whites) joins White Obama supporters in this collective sigh of relief because we were all getting really nervous listening to those hateful rants over and over.  


by Cam5New Mexico on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 08:09:40 PM EST

Re: My take on Obama's speech - still not convince (none / 0)

I also heard the Rev Wright tear into Hillary Clinton back in July (long before her so-called racism was revealed to us in late January).

What was the animus there?  What part does calling her a bitch from the pulpit have to do with the traditional black church?  Where does saying Bill Clinton was "riding dirty" (also months before the primary season began) have to do with Black Liberation Theology?

Rev Wright was an official Obama Surrogate working to link in to the Southern Black Churches (To denigrate and teach hatred against the Clintons to help drive black voters away from her?)

Rev Wright is not in the mainstream of African American churches...that's horseshit.

Church people don't use that kind of vicious language, they don't say damn or take the Lord's name in vein on the altar.

Show me parallels, if I'm wrong.  Obama and his campaign may be trying to convince us that Wright is typical but all they will do is revive white anxiety that black churches aren't really churches at all but hotbeds of  violent radicalism.

Thanks, Obama.  That's really gonna help build bridges.

THE REV WRIGHT WAS AN OBAMA SURROGATE WORKING TO TRASH THE CLINTONS AND BUILD SUPPORT FOR HIM IN THE DEEP SOUTH.

He wasn't on Obama's campaign to provide marriage counseling or spiritual guidence, but to help destroy the Clintons among the African American communities who had hitherto considered her an ally.
 


by PadraigPearse on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 12:30:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My take (none / 0)

I doubt his speech changes anything. And if he wants to imply that anyone who doesn't vote for him is a racist then he's going to get shellacked in the rest of the primaries where there ARE secret ballots.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 09:39:37 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.